Democrats care more about spending than the Neos - 8 billion a month - you call that conservative?

OK so call me a Fiscally conservative Democrat -

In California, big oil spent 100 million in advertising just to quash a clean air proposition-

In last 6 years - "W" made communist China into our biggest bank -now owing them trillions of dollars - financed your WMD Iraq opinion with pure debt- we also owe 100's of Billions to Japan and Europe - the value of the American dollar is low low in comparable value -
uh..thanks a lot -

to mention the amount of dead people - well, it will go down in history - and be a scar on America -

Kerry botched a joke-

Bush botched a war,

presidency,

attack on the USA, (by not welcoming the support of the world- what a BIG botched opportunity!

hurricane disaster in his OWN country - Bill and his Dad did more for the Indonesian tidal wave-

economy- more jobs? yeah right- everybody seems to be working 2 or 3 of 'em to make ends meet- home values are plummeting- people aren't spending - even Walmart down

- heck-uva job

It is nice to see Bush learn a lesson in humility after all the arrogance he has displayed.

We will find out in the next 2 years about all the spending the Dems will do.
One big flaw in your thinking. Just because there is an R next to his name doesnt mean he is conservative. I can put any title you want on anything doesnt mean it is factual. this countrys parties are falling left. why is that well, how about the facts of a Republic.

This is an excerpt on the cycle of democratic nations:

"About the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence (on governement)
8. From dependence back into bondage "

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

1. Population of counties won by: Gore: 127 million; Bush: 143 million;
2. Square miles of land won by: Gore: 580,000; Bush: 2,427,000;
3. States won by: Gore: 19 Bush: 29 (yet Gore almost won the Presidency)
4. Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Gore: 13.2, Bush 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements living off government welfare." Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency & apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some 40 percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase. Thats right, living totally off the governments checks.
"

The apathy of the American populace will lead to the fall of the US as we know it. That is not to say that America is doomed (there is still an Italy). The western and southwestern US will probably be engulfed by the Mexican hordes and you will have the same chaotic nation that Mexico is today there. The military battle will probably be in Texas, because Texans are not going to go down without a fight, California will be an easy conquest because the wealthy liberal elite will simply leave the state and leave the poor and lower middle class to fend for themselves (so much for the caring Democrat ideology), a majority of those classes are Mexican immigrents anyway so it should be pretty easy. S Central LA will be a battleground, cuz the brothers won't go easy either. There will be an influx of people migrating from the west but there is plenty of room for them all and industry will simple migrate with them so jobs should not be an issue. We will be smaller but will be reformed and will probably call for a fascist government.
The ONLY complaint Dems have about the level of spending is that the spending is not on THEIR "projects".

Get real, then get a life!
When your taxes are raised and the tax on gas is raised, say that again...