Logic de la creme? is it not more logical to ASK the most questions? rather than answer the most?

Hi, yahoo answers is a site where humans share resources in the form of humor, expertise, purpose, etc...

When you ask, you get "resourcious" from other people right?

When you answer, you give "resourcious" to other people right?

The "stated leaderboard" is actually the "suckerboard" because it shows the people who "give the most, compared to what they receive right?"

What if it was giving/requesting pennies, right? When I ask a question, other ppl give me their two cents, right?

However, it is those who "give most of their two cents" and "not get back very many 2cents in return" right?

I regularly see doctors and nurses and accountants top the leaderboard, but isn't it the recipients who get the most benefit?

Has anyone gotten married off yahoo answers?

On my old account, i had 3000 points but only asked like 10 questions.

Now I see having a "point surplus" as a total discretionary waste...

I ask as many questions as I answer (because 5 minus 3 = 2)

I agree, the problem is that you have to have points to ask questions and therefor need to answer some. I dislike that

Right on! 2 pts. Lol! I really did just waste 10 seconds. I think I'll go read a book.

Yes.

It's goat #12.

Voltaire, you are obviously an educated person to use that name. But I'm afraid you are being extremely judgmental of the majority of yahooanswer users. We all have our knowledgeable areas, and we ask questions when we need help from those with the knowledge we don't have. (i.e. a history major asking the answer from a physics major.) The former is an authority on history; the latter doesn't know much about history but is a physics whiz. But if the history major does not need the answer to a physics question, then why should he ask?
And by the way, resources is spelled RESOURCES.

Why is this in cooking?